Evie Blad, Education Week, Wednesday, March 04, 2015
As law-enforcement agencies around the country begin using body cameras to monitor police interactions with the public, the chest-mounted recording devices are increasingly making their way into public schools. The use of body cameras in schools has been welcomed by some, but it has also sparked privacy concerns from some districts and civil rights groups. "People tend to be on their best behavior when they know they're being recorded," said Bill Vaughn, the chief of police in Johnston, Iowa, where the 6,700-student district's two school resource officers now wear body cameras.
Tracy Mitrano, Inside Higher Ed, Thursday, February 26, 2015
Wow, they did it, they really did it! The F.C.C. revised its initial rule offering about net neutrality and fast lanes to change the Internet categorization from “information service” to “telecommunications” and brought the entire mobile phone market also into that umbrella. That process was a true demonstration of democracy in action as the shift responded to the over four million comments to the original proposal and a strongly worded intention by President Obama last November. Here is what we all hope to see as a result of this new categorization: resources to build out broadband, improve disability services and create greater digital and information literacies
Tracy Mitrano and Jacob Cunningham, EDUCAUSE, Tuesday, February 10, 2015
Cloud computing shifts the institutional burden from technology to contract formation. Nowhere is this shift more notable than in information management. Many privacy practices and technical security controls must be negotiated up front with the vendor. Physical technology rests on their premises while the institution's regulatory, business needs, and ethical responsibilities to maintain the information appropriately do not change.
Leila Abboud, Reuters, Friday, January 30, 2015
Suni Munshani, Help Net Security, Thursday, January 29, 2015
Whether forced by law or their by their own initiative, businesses must change their mindset and realize that they are not “owners” of their customers’ data that must be monetized, but rather “custodians” of data that needs to be protected. The minute businesses start thinking of themselves of custodians of their customers’ data, they will think a lot harder about how that data is accessed and used. They will put in place protections to keep it out of the hands of people – both inside and outside of their companies – who don’t require it.
Sean Cavanagh and Michele Molnar, Education Week, Tuesday, January 20, 2015
After initially declining to sign up, technology giant Google has joined a growing number of companies committing to a "student privacy pledge" created by advocacy groups and endorsed by the White House. Google has come under heavy scrutiny for privacy practices that critics have feared would open the door to students' personal information being used for advertising purposes, and the company has revised its policies in the face of those questions. The privacy pledge is being sponsored by the Future of Privacy Forum, a Washington-based think tank that advocates for responsible data use, and the Software & Information Industry Association, a leading trade association, also headquartered in the nation's capital.
Wednesday, January 14, 2015
Several months ago a group of privacy advocates and education software providers, with prominent support from the Obama administration, overcame their differences and agreed to a Student Privacy Pledge. The 12 commitments of this pledge make for a remarkably strong document that places important limits on how children’s data can be used by commercial firms. It comes at a time when interest and investment in education technology is booming as never before. Among the pledge’s key commitments...
Tracy Mitrano, Inside Higher Ed, Wednesday, January 14, 2015
The oft-quoted "sale of student data to third parties" might sidestep another great offense involving use of education records: profiling. Companies such as Google do not sell the information that it mines; it uses that data for its own core business purposes of targeted marketing, advertising, or other commercial incentives. No doubt, sale of personally identifiable information in the consumer arena is one of the most common and egregious of business practices in the global information economy. Student information is particularly problematic because it violates existing law (FERPA) and because no one can predict to what uses that data will be made in the future of a student's long life. In particular, one could see how sensitive information collected (gender, class, race, ethnicity) could be used down the road for unforeseen purposes. But the main point is this: it is not just sale but the use to which the company doing the mining will make of the data that must be included in the scope of the proposed legislation.
Rep. Jared Polis (D-Colo.) and Brad Smith, The Hill, Thursday, October 23, 2014
The intersection of the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act of 1974, Children's Online Privacy and Protection Act of 1998, a growing number of state laws, district policies, vendor contracts, and privacy policies create a situation in which it is hard to tell what protections and rights exist for children or for adults. To witness this trend is to worry that legitimate privacy concerns threaten to derail the potential of education technology to improve personalized learning.
Kris Alman, Student Privacy Matters, Sunday, October 19, 2014
A parallel explosion of big data since 2001 is not coincidental. Big data utopians proclaim better integration of fragmented health and education sectors and data analysis will improve outcomes and improve value. The question never seems to be asked, “For whom?”